An average major league player is supposed to be worth about 2 wins above replacement over a full season. I bet you’re wondering which teams had the most above average players this year? And even if you’re not wondering that, you’re going to find out. Unless you leave the page now. In which case, good riddance.
The data I’m using for this exercise is from FanGraphs. I’m setting the cutoff for an average or better major leaguer at 1.9 fWAR for the season, because there are still 2 games left, and because there could be some rounding issues. It’s not perfect, but it’s good enough. I’m also not adjusting for playing time. If you were above average for only a portion of the season, then why weren’t you playing more? You had a broken arm? No excuse. Get out there on the field.
Do playoff teams have more above average players than non-playoff teams? Perhaps! According to my criteria, there were 157 average or better hitters in the major leagues this year, and 88 pitchers. That’s a total of 245 players, or 8.2/team. That’s more than I expected.
Here’s the list of the number of average or better players for all 30 teams, in order. (I assigned 0.5 to each team that traded or acquired a 2+ WAR player in-season.)
The Reds come out on top with 7 average or better hitters and 5 average or better pitchers. That’s pretty good. Seven of their eight regulars are at least average, and four of their five starters, as well as Aroldis Chapman, are all better than average. Only Mike Leake hasn’t been a league average pitcher this year, although he has also been worth 1.3 fWAR as a hitter this year, so if you add that to his pitching total, he’s been above average as well.
Four other teams have at least 11 average or better players this year; the Braves, Rangers, Cardinals, and Rays. Those first three will make the playoffs, while the Rays made it very close. The next five teams are the Angels, Diamondbacks, Dodgers, Yankees and Tigers. Only 2 of those are making the playoffs, but the Dodgers and Angels are both very close, and the Diamondbacks are a good team as well. Next up is the Brewers and Giants, and then we finally get to the Nationals, who are tied with the Red Sox. That’s a bit strange, and is perhaps the best demonstration that having a couple of 5+ WAR players is not the same as having a bunch of just above average guys. At the end of the day, If you get 7 WAR from one 6 win guy and one 1 win guy, it’s the same as having one 4 win guy and one 3 win guy, except that it’s probably easier to upgrade the 1 win guy than it is the 3 or 4 win guy.
So that’s 14 teams that have more than 8.2 average or better players. Eight of those 14 teams will make the playoffs. The other 2 playoff teams are the Athletics, who have 8 average guys, and the Orioles, who have 6.5. The Athletics are very close to having more than average, and much has been written about the Orioles and their team of over-achievers.
Overall, it’s a pretty decent indication of the quality of a team – which makes sense. The more above average players on your team, the better you should be. It’s not perfect, but it’s interesting. Kind of.
Last year around this time, you heard a lot of talk about the decline of third base production around major league baseball. Or at least I did. Or at least it seems like I did. “It’s a sinkhole!”, is an example of something someone might have said about the position. “Why don’t we just play two shortstops?” is another thing someone might have said. Although probably not. Anyway, third baseman around the league in 2011 OPSed only .707. This was below second basemen at .709, and just above catchers at .703. It was a poor showing. Only 5 teams got an OPS of over .800 out of their third basemen last year, while there were 7 teams under .650, including the Mariners at only .526. (I’m looking at you Chone Figgins)
This year, league third basemen are at .753, back above second basemen, center fielders, and left fielders. There are 9 teams that have received at least an .800 OPS from their third baseman, and just 3 teams under .650. But what’s the cause of this increase? Is it rookies who have come in to the league and torn it up? Is it players who have come back from injury? Is it a few players having career years? Let’s take a look:
Not surprisingly, the team with the biggest increase in 2012 compared to 2011 is the Tigers. Who would have guessed that going from Brandon Inge and Don Kelly to Miguel Cabrera would increase your offensive production? The next largest increase is the Brewers, who went from second last in 2011 with Casey McGehee to third overall in 2012 with the signing of Aramis Ramirez. Pedro Alvarez’s emergence in Pittsburgh has resulted in the Pirates having the third largest increase in 2012, followed by the Mariners, who switched from Chone Figgins to someone who can actually make contact with a baseball. Other large increases include Chase Headley’s breakout with the Padres, a full season of David Freese in St. Louis, and David Wright’s resurgence. Overall, 19 teams have had increased production from their third basemen in 2012, including 8 with a jump of more than 100 points of OPS. Of the 11 teams that declined, only two were by more than 100 points of OPS; the Red Sox and the Cubs. The Red Sox decline is largely a product of Youkilis’ slow start and replacements once Middlebrooks got injured, while the Cubs lost Aramis Ramirez and replaced him with Luis Valbuena and Ian Stewart.
So really the increase in production is a combination of a number of factors. There’s some players who have had breakthroughs or returned to past form (Headley, Wright, Zimmerman). There are some teams who simply replaced sink holes with average production (Mariners, Rockies, Pirates). And then there’s Miguel Cabrera.
Recently over at FanGraphs there were two articles posted looking at how many miles each MLB team has to travel in the 2013 season. (AL here)(NL here) As one could predict, the teams in the West divisions end up traveling substantially more than the teams in the East and Central divisions. What I wondered though, was if this actually had any effect on a team’s performance during the season. That is, does the amount of miles that a team travels over the course of a season have any effect on that teams’ winning percentage? If it did, you would anticipate that the teams that travel more miles during the season would see some negative effect on their overall winning percentage – due to the additional stress or other factors.
My feeling, was that due to the methods of travel available to all major league teams – charter aircrafts, etc., the effect of additional travel would be extremely minimal.
The first thing that I did, was to calculate the distance in air miles between each major league city, using this website. This was rather tedious, but unfortunately my interns were out of the office today, so I had to to it myself. Next I used the MLB schedule files from 2005-2011, available on Retrosheet, to calculate the travel destination pairings that each team made in each season. I chose to go back to 2005 because that’s the first year after the Expos moved to Washington, and no other team has moved locations since then. I then got each teams winning percentage in said season to be able to see if there was any correlation between miles traveled and winning percentage.
Before we get to the results, let’s look at a couple things. From 2005-2011, here is the average miles traveled by each team in a season, from highest to lowest:
The Mariners have gotten the short end of the stick (long end?)in terms of travel miles since 2005, average almost 50,000 miles a season; almost double that of the Milwaukee Brewers.
The highest single season miles total for an individual team was 54,670 by the Seattle Mariners in 2008. They went 61-101 that year. The lowest single season miles total was 22,703 by the St. Louis Cardinals in 2005. They went 100-62 that year. Maybe there is a correlation! On to the results.
*Click to make larger
So, when I ran the miles traveled by each team against their winning percentage in that season, the R-square came out to be 0.0000977. Really small. No statistical significance at all. I also ran total miles traveled against a team’s road winning percentage, because I thought maybe the additional miles traveled would affect a team more on the road. The R-square for that was 0.0000809; even smaller than with overall winning percentage.
In conclusion, (as long as I didn’t screw anything up horribly), the amount that a team travels during a season has no statistically significant correlation with the team’s winning percentage. I don’t really have a valid explanation for this, other than the relative comfort that all teams travel in these days, but it would seem that even though the teams out west travel more, they don’t face any repercussions for doing so.
I find the 1981 season to be quite fascinating, as due to a strike in the middle of season, the playoff teams were determined in a strange fashion. Whichever teams were leading their division pre-strike would make the playoffs, but whichever teams lead their division post-strike would make the playoffs as well. This lead to the Cincinnati Reds having the best record in the NL West for the season as a whole, but because they finished second in both the first half and second half – they did not make the playoffs.
Well wouldn’t it be fun to see what would happen if this method of playoff determining was still in effect today? Not really? Well, that’s just your opinion, and I’m going to do it anyway.
The rules for the playoffs(as decided by myself . I’m often referred to a young Bowie Kuhn.) are as follows: The winner of each division in each half qualifies for the playoffs. If the same team wins both halves, then the second place team with the best single half winning percentage wins the second playoff spot. The two teams in each league with the best single half winning percentages get first round byes in the playoffs, while the remaining four teams will square off in the first round.
Now let’s move on to the results of the first half:
|AL East||W||L||W-L%||GB||NL East||W||L||W-L%||GB|
|AL Central||W||L||W-L%||GB||NL Central||W||L||W-L%||GB|
The Yankees ran away with the AL East in the first half, and also had the best winning percentage in the AL. The White Sox finished three games up on the surprising Indians to win the Central, while the Rangers finished four games ahead of the Angels to take the West.
In the NL, the Nationals won the playoff spot in the East, while the Pirates finished a game ahead of the Reds to take the Central. There was some controversy in the NL West, as the Dodgers finished only 0.5 games ahead of the Giants, but also were allowed to play one more game than the Giants – perhaps a sign of the schedule makers showing an LA bias. Bruce Bochy was reportedly furious.
On to the second half standings as of today:
|AL East||W||L||W-L%||GB||NL East||W||L||W-L%||GB|
|AL Central||W||L||W-L%||GB||NL Central||W||L||W-L%||GB|
The Orioles are well on their way to winning the second AL East playoff spot, and they currently sport a better winning percentage than the Yankees did in the first half. The Tigers and White Sox are battling it out in the Central, although the White Sox already clinched a spot in the first half. The Tigers will make the playoffs as long as they can keep their winning percentage over the .518 that the Indians posted in the first half. In the West, the A’s are running away with the division, and currently have the best AL winning percentage. If the season ended today, the A’s and Orioles would have first round byes, while the Yankees would host the White Sox and the Rangers would host the Tigers.
Over in the NL, Washington is likely going to take the division again, but because they already clinched in the first half, the real race is for second place between the Braves and the Phillies, who are only separated by a half game. The Reds are cruising in the Central, and currently have the highest NL winning percentage of any team. Over in the West, the Giants hold a 1.5 game lead over the upstart Padres, who have really turned it around in the second half. If the season ended today, the Reds and Nationals would have first round byes, while the Giants would host the Dodgers, and the Braves would host the Pirates.
These last few weeks of the season should be exciting to say the least!
The Orioles won their 82nd game of the year yesterday, securing their first winning record since 1997 – when they won 98 games and the AL East. They won 79 games in 1998, then 78 games in 1999, which they would match again in 2004. Between 2007 and 2011, they did not win 70 games in any season. They were terrible for an extended period of time. Every year after the season was over, the Orioles played a round robin tournament against local high school teams. They came in last every time.* Their only comparables in terms of long periods of awfulness are the Pirates and the Royals. The Pirates haven’t had a winning record since 1992, while the Royals have had one winning record in the last 19 seasons – when they won 83 games in 2003.
But back to the Orioles. They’re only a game back of the Yankees for first in the AL East. You’ve heard of the Yankees right? They have the highest payroll in baseball. The Orioles are ranked 19th – about $115 million back. Which seems like a huge problem – except that Tampa Bay has made the playoffs 3 of the last 4 years with a lower payroll than the Orioles. The Orioles have had some pretty large payrolls in the past, but they haven’t spent their money in the smartest ways; ways that transfer over to the win column. The same could probably be said for this year. The Orioles current starting lineup includes both Nate McLouth and Lew Ford. Lew Ford is currently sporting an OPS under .600, but keeps getting at-bats because the Orioles don’t really have any better options. Randy Wolf started for Baltimore today. In a pennant race. That should tell you something about the current state of the Orioles. But somehow it’s working.
It’s the end of an era. The Orioles have sucked for a really long time. In a way they kind of still suck this year, but they’ve still won a lot of games. They could win the AL East. Which would be really strange. I eagerly anticipate seeing how the Orioles perform in 2012. Obviously they’ll have at least a partially different roster, but will they be able to over-perform their run differential again? Or will they fade back into the depths of the AL East? I hope that they revert to their terrible ways. There’s already too much uncertainty in the world to have to worry about the Orioles actually being good. Damn you Orioles.* I made this up.
Well, Giancarlo knocked another one out of the park a few days ago, so that means it’s time for the return of All of the Giancarlo Stanton Home Runs. It was his 34th of the season, which equaled his total from 2011. GIF!
Home run #34 – September 11 – off Roy Halladay – 371 feet
Roy Halladay generally seems like a pretty intense guy. He doesn’t like talking to anyone on the days that he takes the mound. Rumor has it that before one of his starts in 2011, Wilson Valdez said “hello” to Roy Halladay. This angered Halladay so much that he hired a hitman to murder Wilson Valdez. The hit was scheduled for January 31, 2012. (The hitman is a very busy guy – no time to do it earlier.) Unfortunately for Halladay, Wilson Valdez was traded to the Cincinnati Reds on January 25 – just days before the hit was to take place. Fortunately for Valdez, the hitman that Halladay hired would not travel to Cincinnati, due to some past bad experiences. Valdez was saved.
Fast forward to September 11th (never forget), when Giancarlo Stanton hit this homerun off Halladay. Halladay was so furious after he gave up the home run, that after the game he contacted a hitman in Cincinnati to murder Wilson Valdez; again. Don’t ask me what the two things have to do with one another. Just know that Wilson Valdez’s days are numbered.
Hopefully Giancarlo will go on a nice home run streak before the end of the season so that he can get to 40 bombs. That would be swell. Until next time!
Chone Figgins has been awful this year. He was also awful last year. The year before that he wasn’t awful, but he also wasn’t very good. That was in 2010, the first year of a 4 year – $36 million contract that he had signed with the Mariners that off season. Obviously that deal did not work out for the Mariners, as Figgins has been almost historically-terrible in the last 2 seasons, which lead me to wonder the results of other Mariners multi-year free agent signings that took place in the last several years. The only other one I could remember was Adrian Beltre, which turned out OK, but it turns out the overall results are not good.
Chone Figgins – Signed 4 years / $36 million for 2010-2013 – We’re now almost 3/4 of the way through the deal, and Figgins has been worth approximately -1.2 fWAR over those 3 seasons, while being paid for somewhere around 5-8 wins. When Figgins signed the deal, he was coming off a 6.9 fWAR season with the Angels, so the expectation that he would be good was not ridiculous. He was also going to be 32 during his first season with the Mariners though, so it was also not unreasonable to expect some decline. Not the sort of decline that happened though.
Miguel Olivo – Signed 2 years / $7 million for 2011-2012 – The Mariners are only paying Olivo $3.5 million a season, which isn’t very high for a decent starting catcher. Unfortunately for the Mariners, Olivo has not been a decent starting catcher. His OBP over his 2 years in Seattle is .236. There are 9 pitchers who have a higher OBP than that over the last 2 seasons (min 40 PA.) Olivo has been worth 0 fWAR for Seattle. The Mariners are only paying him for about 0.5-1 wins/season, but he hasn’t even provided that. Over his previous 2 seasons before signing the deal, Olivo was worth 4.6 fWAR with the Rockies and the Royals.
Carlos Silva – Signed 4 years / $48 million for 2008-2011 – This signing was made by the Mariners previous GM Bill Bavasi, and could very well have played a major role in Bavasi’s firing. When the deal was signed, Silva had a career K/9 under 4. That’s ridiculous. Unsurprisingly, the deal did not work out. Silva only made it though 2 seasons with Seattle before being exchanged for Milton Bradley. In his time with the Mariners, Silva threw 180.2 innings with a 6.81 ERA. Silva actually managed 1.3 fWAR over his time with the Mariners, but if you look at RA-9 wins, he actually cost the Mariners 1.9 wins.
Miguel Batista – Signed 3 years / $25 million for 2007-2009 – Batista was going into his age 36 season at the time of the signing, but he was coming off a 3 win season for the Diamondbacks. Batista was pretty average in his first year with the Mariners, putting up 2.4 fWAR in 193 innings in 2007. In 2008 he struggled and was moved to the bullpen, where he finished the season with over 6 BB/9 innings and -1.3 fWAR. In the final year of the deal, Batista pitched at replacement level out of the pen. Over the 3 years of the contract, Batista totaled 1.1 wins for $25 million.
Adrian Beltre – Signed 5 years / $64 million for 2005-2009 – The year before this deal was signed, Beltre hit 48 bombs and was worth 9.9 fWAR for the Dodgers. Obviously he wouldn’t reproduce those numbers, especially in Safeco, but the Mariners likely thought they were still getting a valuable player. Which they did end up getting, but one who somewhat underperformed at the plate, although Beltre largely made up for it with his defense. Over the 5 years with Seattle, Beltre was worth 16.7 fWAR, or $3.83 million/win. I’m not sure what the “market” value for WAR was back in 2005, because no one really cared about that sort of thing back then, but this contract definitely turned out the best of any of the 5 listed here.
So there you have it – the 5 most recent multi-year free agent signings made by the Mariners. One worked out for the most part, the other 4 turned out pretty terribly. Now, in this time the Mariners also re-signed Felix Hernandez, which has worked out terrifically, but I’m just focusing on free-agent signings here – which have definitely not been terrific for the Mariners.